Facing mounting public pressure in a fight over equitable pay, U. According to a letter released Monday by Carlos Cordeiro, president of U. The total does not include the value of benefits received only by the women, like healthcare. Comparing compensation between the two teams is difficult because the mzkes structure is based on different collective bargaining agreements. Here is what they cannot deny. For every comparable win or tie, his bonus is higher.
The U. Soccer Federation says «market realities» explain the pay gap. Others say it’s institutionalized sexism. Shortly after, the crowd started chanting «equal pay! Soccer unjustly pays female players less than male players. It’s been a long-standing point of contention between female players and U. Soccer — which is the body that governs America’s national soccer teams — though it was only in March that all 28 female players on the U. The class-action lawsuit claimed that «female players have been consistently paid less money than their male counterparts. This is true even though their performance has been superior to that of the male players — with the female players, in contrast to male players, becoming world champions. Soccer also failed to provide female players with equal working conditions, promotion and support. In a May court filing , U. Soccer President Carlos Cordeiro in support of the women’s team.
A reality check
Some lawmakers also expressed support on Twitter. Meanwhile, the women’s team’s case is heading to mediation. So, what explains the gender pay gap? How is it fair that the more-successful women’s team earns less than the men’s team? Does women’s soccer simply generate less revenue? Is institutionalized sexism to blame? There’s no immediately clear answer, but you can get some insight by looking at the differences between the men’s and women’s teams in terms of revenue generation, collective-bargaining agreements and awards from FIFA. But that’s beginning to change — at least in terms of gate revenues, which consist mainly of ticket sales. As The Wall Street Journal notes in a recent article :. But only about one-quarter of U.
Most Popular Videos
Read it. Not sure if the wife would agree though! Telegram is a free messaging app that you can download on your phone in 30 seconds. But there are other parts of the story that make the narrative more complicated. Notify me of new posts by email. Soccer Federation, its parent organization, in March over gender discrimination. Which of course meant not betting on horse racing at all, but on football, rugby, cricket or tennis matches.
Letter from U.S. Soccer president Carlos Cordeiro comes ahead of mediation in the women’s teams pay-equity lawsuit
Certainly that was my view. Apart from an annual punt on the Grand National I steered well maks. Another obstacle is mental arithmetic. If ever a gambler tried to talk me through the basics, I glazed over within seconds.
My reward? Typical Villa left it late, nabbing the winner in the 88th maes. Which set me thinking, could short odds betting, whereby the chances of something happening are relatively high, at the very least beat interest rates offered by banks and building societies?
But I kept at it. But soon I was the one laughing. In fact, with 50 bets now under my belt, my profit margin stands at Beat that, Nationwide. How have I done it? First, by betting only on short odds. Secondly, I paid only in cash. As certain pals of mine admitted, internet accounts are an open doorway to temptation. Thirdly, I kept detailed records, to log my progress but also to ensure that I never tried to kid.
He mkaes right. Andy Murray to beat Novak Djokovic. What was I thinking? Which of course meant not betting on horse racing at all, but on football, rugby, cricket aoccer tennis matches. And only ever on the result. Too complicated, too great a mental strain.
When I tell hardened gamblers of my success rate, they ask which tipsters I read, which form guides I consult. Embarrassed, I have to admit I barely take more than five minutes a week to choose which match to bet on. But frankly, I could never be bothered to walk the extra half mile. Maybe I am just lucky. But now that my year of betting responsibly is over, and my winnings have gone to charity, I am conflicted. Should I carry on, if only for the craic?
Should I be upping my weekly stake? Why not bulk up your savings at the bookie wjo than let it sit in a bank or building society or some fixed-rate bond, earning measly interest?
There are at least 30, reasons why readers should not follow my example by seeking to boost their income via the bookmakers. That was the number of calls that individuals with, or affected by, gambling problems made to the charity GamCare ina number expected to rise when the latest figures are released next month. My one-year dalliance with short odds betting might have been an interesting and profitable diversion, but for an estimatedpeople, gambling their way out of the recession is not going to plan.
Some punters, it is true, do mkes from short odds woccer. That takes nerve, or recklessness. This might explain the exponential increase in the number of online tipsters. Siccer he was impressed makrs my end total of Or would I have followed the example soccdr most compulsive gamblers and tried to win maks the shortfall with a series of higher odds bets?
So my advice to anyone thinking of emulating my Year of Betting Responsibly is not to follow suit. Sure, you might end up in profit. Facebook Twitter Pinterest. Topics Consumer affairs.
Gambling Savings rates Banks and building societies Savings features. Reuse this content. Order by newest oldest recommendations. Show 25 25 50 All. Threads collapsed expanded unthreaded. Loading comments… Trouble loading? Most popular.
That’s according to audited financial statements from the U. The Journal report notes that the «ability of the women’s team to generate gate revenues that equals or exceeds the men’s team is an important battleground,» and central to an ongoing lawsuit filed against the USSF by 28 members of the U. According to The Journalthis difference can largely be attributed to ticket sales.
Site Index
The USSF sells broadcast and sponsorship rights for the men’s and women’s teams together, and as a result, it can be difficult to determine the exact broadcast value of the two teams. Soccer is the U. These women are heroes and I think that carries great value. The men’s national team has issued a statement of support for the women’s team lawsuit against the USSF and for this revenue-sharing model. Like this story? Get Make It newsletters delivered to your inbox. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
Post a Comment